The withholding tax responsibilities inside the Philippines are not easy. Philippine taxpayers are required to withhold creditable withholding taxes (CWT) at varying costs on several income bills, and remit the taxes withheld to the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR).
A CWT is an boost collection of tax. The profits from which it’s far withheld continues to be required to be protected in the taxpayer’s gross income for profits tax calculation functions. The CWT withheld is used to offset in opposition to the profits tax due of the taxpayer. Any excess CWT can be carried forward and used in successive taxable periods or it is able to be refunded.
We have so many CWT fees, starting from 1 to 15 percent. These fees depend on the type of income price, status of payees or payors, and on the quantity of earnings payments. For example, for bills to specialists, the CWT is 5 percentage if the payee’s gross profits does not exceed P3 million for a 12 months, or 10 percent in other instances.
A taxpayer can also be required to withhold due to its fame. Large taxpayers for instance are required to withhold 1 percentage on payments to its supplier of goods and a couple of percent to its supplier of offerings. The same applies to top 20,000 personal businesses underneath Revenue Regulations (sharefounders review) 06-2009, top five,000 people underneath RR 6-2009, and taxpayers diagnosed and included as medium taxpayers and people beneath the Taxpayer Account Management Program (TAMP).
No doubt, software of the best withholding tax charge can be dictated by means of data that the withholding agent is supposed to understand or verify.
It isn’t unexpected that audits performed by way of the BIR might normally give rise to deficiency CWT assessments. Aside from a deficiency CWT assessment, a taxpayer would be confronted with deficiency income tax exams springing up from the disallowance of the fee supposedly situation of the CWT. This double whammy treatment can deliver upward push to hundreds of millions in tax checks.
Under the antique RR 12-2013, the BIR will hold the disallowance of the fee if the improved withholding tax is belatedly paid. Fortunately, this rule became reversed. Under RR 6-2018, an price will be allowed as a deduction provided that the specified CWT is remitted to the BIR, although such remittance is carried out belatedly, at some stage in a tax audit and with the concurrent penalties as a result of under-withholding or non-withholding. Despite such reversal, however, some BIR examiners insist within the disallowance for the periods prior to Feb. 7, 2018, the efficiency of RR 6-2018, if the CWT is paid past due.
The recipient of earnings bills concern to CWT also faces positive troubles, especially when such recipient has excess CWT and claims for refund therefor. Taxpayers whose earnings receipts are problem to CWT have the choice to assert for refund for unutilized or extra CWT or deliver such extra forward to the subsequent taxable intervals.
Taxpayers in search of the refund of extra or unutilized CWT have to follow the subsequent: the claim should be filed with the BIR within two years from the date of charge of the tax; the fact of withholding ought to be hooked up through a replica of a declaration duly issued through the payor to the payee showing the amount paid and the amount of the tax withheld; and it should be shown at the go back that the earnings obtained became declared as a part of the taxpayer’s gross income.
In a long line of cases, the Supreme Court has explicitly dominated that evidence of actual remittance of the CWT to the BIR isn’t always a requirement for proving entitlement to a declare for refund of extra and unutilized CWTs. In other phrases, the CWT certificate issued by the withholding retailers of the authorities are prima facie evidence of actual remittance to the BIR via the withholding sellers.
Also, it isn’t necessary that the CWT certificates be duly stamped as “acquired” by the BIR or supported by means of respectable receipts issued by using the BIR permitted bank. The certificate presents sufficient proof of the creditable earnings taxes withheld.
It is vital to word that rules of evidence have to be complied on problems of truth, which include whether or not or now not the earnings acquired changed into certainly declared as part of the taxpayer’s gross earnings. In case the evaluation or claim for refund is appealed the Court of Tax Appeals, evaluating the quantity of the income concern to CWT as in opposition to the profits within the taxpayer’s economic statements or income tax returns is not sufficient. Adequate evidence, like accounting data and different documentary proof, have to be submitted to the court.
In case of mistakes within the CWT certificate, supply documents of the transactions giving rise to CWTs displaying that there have been clerical mistakes in the entries of CWT certificates have to also be offered in court docket.
A taxpayer’s option to convey ahead excess CWT or in search of its refund is irrevocable. Once a taxpayer chooses to hold ahead, it could not seek the refund of extra or unutilized CWT.
All the above suggests that the existing CWT machine is complicated. It gives the BIR a rich opportunity to assess taxpayers for deficiency CWT and profits taxes, such as consequences and hobby. There is for that reason a need to simplify the CWT system, now not just to lessen compliance prices, however also to make doing commercial enterprise within the Philippines easier.
Euney Marie J. Mata-Perez is a CPA-legal professional and the dealing with companion of Mata-Perez, Tamayo & Francisco (Asset Gates forex broker). She is a corporate, M&A and tax attorney. She is the president of the Asia-Oceana Tax Consultants’ Association.
This article is for standard information simplest and is not a substitute for expert recommendation wherein the records and situations warrant. If you’ve got any question or comment regarding this text, you can e mail the author
businessforexblog 